|
Hypertension
Hypertension is currently defined by the US Joint
National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation,
and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC) and World
Health Organisation – International Society of
Hypertension (WHO/ISH) as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140
mmHg or diastolic ≥ 90 mmHg1. The Framingham
data2 show that these levels are present in:
40% of the community over age 50
60% of the community over age 60
90% of the community over age 90
As such, it is the most common medical disorder in our
society. New guidelines for treatment refer to the value
of using parameters such as those provided by
SphygmoCor to complement measured blood pressure values
when making decisions for individuals. There has been a
strong push for this from the WHO/ISH3 and the working
group of the European Society of Hypertension4, 5,
6.
In hypertension management, the SphygmoCor system has
unique utility in that it can uncover clinically
significant differences in central blood pressures, and
central blood pressure profiles, even between patients
who have equivalent cuff pressure readings7.
The SphygmoCor system is thus a tool for improved
hypertension management in that it provides the key
cardiovascular data being assessed in making therapy
decisions – and monitoring the effectiveness of therapy
- for these patients.
How SphygmoCor Can Improve Hypertension Management
The SphygmoCor system can improve cardiovascular
assessment and associated therapy decisions in
hypertension management by providing more precise and
specific information about central arterial pressure.
SphygmoCor is of value in determining whether or not
to commence therapy for persons with borderline
elevation of arterial pressure and evidence of aortic
arteriosclerosis, as the degree (or absence) of
elevation of central pressures are of heightened
relevance in these individuals. Avoidance of therapy –
if appropriate – is both a source of potential cost
savings and a reduction in patient compliance burden.
Isolated systolic
hypertension (ISH), the most common condition
requiring intervention at this time, is caused by
stiffening of the aorta and large arteries8,9,10.
SphygmoCor is of value in the management of ISH because
it provides direct information on aortic systolic
pressure (Augmentation Pressure and Augmentation Index).
True ISH can be confirmed through measure of significant
augmentation of late systolic pressure causing a high
late systolic shoulder on the aortic pressure waveform11,12.
These parameters can be monitored periodically so as to
determine the central effects of therapy regimen(s).
Spurious systolic hypertension of youth
describes substantial elevation of brachial systolic
pressure above 140 mmHg - generally due to amplification
of the pulse waveform in the upper limb - but with
normal or low aortic systolic pressures. It is found in
over 10% of adolescent males11,13,14. In the
Framingham offspring study15,16, such persons
were found to have low - not high - cardiovascular risk.
No treatment is warranted for these individuals14.
Arterial tonometry is of value to exclude the need for
therapy in this condition because it is readily
recognized with arterial tonometry, which shows normal
aortic pressures and low AIx.
“White coat hypertension” is a phenomenon
often apparent when arousal causing catecholamine
release leads to increased cardiac output and elevation
of brachial arterial pressure but with normal or lowered
peripheral resistance17,18. SphygmoCor shows
a dominant initial aortic systolic pressure wave with
normal (for age) or reduced AIx, and is therefore of
value to exclude the need for therapy in these
individuals.
Pseudohypertension is elevated brachial
arterial pressure caused by rigidity of tissue in the
upper arm such that the pressure applied to the arm by
the cuff does not compress the brachial artery19.
SphygmoCor can exclude the need for therapy in
pseudohypertension as central pressures are normal for
age and do not show the expected increased AIx and
reduced Tr for evidence of aortic stiffening.
Summary
References 1. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee of
Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High
Blood Pressure. JAMA 2003;289:2560-72
2. Vasan RS, Beiser A, Seshadri S, et al. Residual
lifetime risk for developing hypertension in middle-aged
women and men. JAMA 2002;287:1003-10
3. Chalmers J, MacMahon S, Mancia G, et al. 1999 WHO –
International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the
Management of Hypertension. J Hypertens 1999;17:151-83
4. Safar ME. Epidemiological findings imply that goals
for drug treatment of hypertension need to be revised.
(Editorial) Circulation 2001;103:1188-90.
5. Franklin SS, Wilkinson IB, Cockcroft JR. Does
hypertensive cardiovascular risk need redefining?
Hypertension 2002
6. Safar ME, London GM for the Clinical Committee of
Arterial Structure and Function, on behalf of the
Working Group on Vascular Structure and Function of the
European Society of Hypertension. Therapeutic studies
and arterial stiffness in hypertension: recommendations
of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens
2000;18:1527-35.
7. Franklin SS, Larson MG, Khan SA, et al. Does the
relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease
risk change with aging? The Framingham Heart Study.
Circulation 103(9): 1245-9, 2001.
8. Franklin SS, Wilkinson IB, Cockcroft JR. Does
hypertensive cardiovascular risk need redefining?
Hypertension 2002.
9. Safar ME, London GM for the Clinical Committee of
Arterial Structure and Function, on behalf of the
Working Group on Vascular Structure and Function of the
European Society of Hypertension. Therapeutic studies
and arterial stiffness in hypertension: recommendations
of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens
2000;18:1527-35.
10. Izzo JL Jr, Levy D, Black HR. Importance of systolic
blood pressure in older Americans. Hypertension
2000;35:1021-24.
11. Nichols WW, O’Rourke MF. McDonald’s blood flow in
arteries. 4th Edition. Edward Arnold, London, 1998.
12. Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, Duprez DA, et al.
Bypassing complex aortic wave morphology: a simple and
direct assessment of aortic augmentation index based on
aortic-radial parallelism. (Abstract) Am J Hypertens
2001;14:124A-125A.
13. Mahmud A, Feely J. Spurious systolic hypertension of
youth: fit young men with elastic arteries. Am J
Hypertens 2003;16:229-32.
14. O’Rourke MF, Vlachopolous C, Graham RM. Spurious
hypertension in youth. Vasc Med 5(3):141-5, 2000.
15. Franklin SS, Khan SA, Wong ND, et al. The relation
of blood pressure to coronary heart disease risk as a
function of age: the Framingham Heart Study. (Abstract)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:291A.
16. Franklin SS, Larson MG, Khan SA et al. Does the
relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease
risk change with ageing? The Framingham Heart Study.
Circulation 2001;103:1245-49.
17. Mansour GA, White WB. White coat hypertension. In
Hypertension. Oparil S, Weber M (Eds). Philadelphia:
Saunders 1996 p314-20.
18. Siegel WV, Blumenthal JH, Devine GW. Physiological,
psychological and behavioral factors and white coat
hypertension. Hypertension 1990;16:140-46.
19. Messerli FH, Ventura HO, Amodeo C. Osler’s maneuver
and pseudohypertension. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1548-51.
|